Posted January 4, 2026.
About a year ago Candace Owens started an investigation she called “Becoming Brigitte.” In this investigation series Candace Owens claimed the wife of the President of France was a man. This resulted in a lawsuit being filed against Owens – EMMANUEL MACRON and BRIGITTE MACRON, Plaintiffs, v. CANDACE OWENS, CANDACE OWENS LLC, and GEORGETOM, INC. Defendants. C.A. No. N25C-07-194 SKR
While waiting for the results of a motion to dismiss by Owens, a friend and colleague of hers, Charlie Kirk, was assassinated. Owens then started an investigation searching for the truth about who killed Charlie Kirk. During this investigation Owens said in one of her podcasts that the French was involved in a plot to murder her. Since the US government has not published any information concerning this claim we don’t know if this assassination plot by the French against Candace Owens was because they wanted to silence Owens because of what she was saying about Brigitte Macron or Charlie Kirk.
Whoever it was, it seems that the French did not like Charlie Kirk very much either. Their complete distain for Kirk was published in the following article. If the French hated Kirk this much it seems likely they would hate Owens much more.
The think tank – “IRIS – Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques” published an article in September 2025 the same month Charlie Kirk was killed titled, “THE ASSASSINATION OF CHARLIE KIRK.”
The article was written by Lincoln A. Mitchell / Political analyst, essayist, lecturer / at Columbia University. Here are a few quotes from the document.
“Kirk was not a free speech warrior as some have suggested. He was not, despite the claims in the bizarre and morally tone deaf apologia penned by Ezra Klein, who is the official voice of donor class liberals and center-right critics of Trump’s excesses, somebody who practiced politics the right way. Kirk was a fascist propagandist. I do not support the assassination of fascist propagandists, but when they are assassinated, they should not be turned into martyrs, nor should, to turn that Shakespeare line on its head, the evil they do “be interred with their bones.””
“Kirk was a man who rose to fame and wealth by inciting and celebrating violence and hatred with a kind of blustery and sneery panache. To describe Kirk differently, despite the violent and horrific last seconds of his young life, is to be intellectually dishonest and unfair to his memory, and to those whose lives he sought to ruin during his brief career.”
“It is also critical to recognize that denouncing political violence, as so many have done, is only meaningful if all political violence is denounced. Kirk himself was largely silent, or worse, in the face of political violence aimed at Democrats. However, political violence does not just mean violent acts aimed at high-profile people, but also the daily political violence of life in America. That means speaking out school shootings enabled by Republican elected officials, but also against the violence committed on an almost daily basis by Trump’s 21st-century American Gestapo known as ICE, as well as the widespread violence of the carceral state.”
The full article is here: https://www.iris-france.org/en/the-assassination-of-charlie-kirk/
======= END