CKM-002 – The War Game at UVU that ended with the Assassination of Charlie Kirk!
Posted January 8, 2026.
Or was this war game story planted to throw people off the track?
Hold on to your seat folks we are going to take a ride down the RABBIT HOLE!
FIRST SOME DISCLAIMERS:
- Everything in this article is only the Opinion or Viewpoint of the editors of CharlesKirkMurder.org. Many statements are only hypothetical or speculative and are not given as facts. We try to show the reader which are opinions or which are facts.
- We are NOT accusing anyone of doing anything illegal.
- We are NOT saying as a fact that anyone mentioned in this article is in any way connected with the assassination of Charlie Kirk. (Except those already mentioned in the news and by the police as such.) We are speaking here in the legal sense, as a party to a conspiracy, etc. but even in the case of an accusation or arrest – “Charges are allegations only. All arrested persons are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, in a court of law.”
- The only thing we ARE doing is pointing out some unusual facts and circumstances that might be of help in the defense of anyone who might be unjustly accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk, being an accessory to murder, or being part of a conspiracy to commit murder. And if Tyler Robinson IS NOT a “lone assassin” this information might help to point out some other person/s who might know more than we are being told. As of the writing of this report only one person has been arrested and charged in the assassination of Charlie Kirk and that is Tyler Robinson.
- This help might come in the form of a defense that could include psychological programming and/or manipulation. Help might come in the form of various forms of entrapment. Lastly help might come in the knowledge of planted evidence, lies by many people, both in and out of government, or “Brainwashing, Mind Control, or Hyper-Persuasion.”
AFTERWORD:
- Everyone as far as they are able must support this website and Candace Owens who is doing the most original research, and who truly is searching for the TRUTH about the Charlie Kirk assassination. A very special appreciation and call out goes to all those who are supplying tips, and others doing original research, posting articles and videos, and asking questions. Foremost of those leading in this search for truth is Candace Owens who was a true friend and colleague of Charlie Kirk, and to whom we owe so much for her example of how to navigate those murky waters full of lies, corruption, greed, and personal attacks while fighting the forces of evil.
True, there have been other people who questioned the official narrative, but it was because of Owens’ close connection to Charlie Kirk and TPUSA that Candice became one of the leading podcasts in the world. Because of that and the fact Owens’ would NOT STOP asking questions is why today fewer and fewer people still believe the slop the government is putting out.
- Where do we go from here? We must all keep searching for the truth until the right person is (or persons are, as the case may be) held accountable for the assassination of Charlie Kirk in a court of law.
- As more information is discovered and analyzed, as farmers know so well, the cream will always rise to the top. These nuggets of truth and fact must be fully published in all media sources and ways must be found that this information gets to all those involved in any court cases related to this matter.
- Everyone must widen the scope of the investigation. The official story does not account for all of the facts that are known. Nor for all the lies and misdirection by everyone involved both in and out of government.
- Everyone can also help in this investigation by helping us fill out our website with facts, videos, pictures and articles here at CharlesKirkMurder.org.
We will NOT stay silent.
“The Sound Of Silence”
Hello, darkness, my old friend
I’ve come to talk with you again
Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted in my brain
Still remains
Within the sound of silence
In restless dreams I walked alone
Narrow streets of cobblestone
‘Neath the halo of a streetlamp
I turned my collar to the cold and damp
When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of a neon light
That split the night
And touched the sound of silence
And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people, maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never share
No one dared
Disturb the sound of silence
“Fools,” said I, “You do not know
Silence like a cancer grows
Hear my words that I might teach you
Take my arms that I might reach you.”
But my words like silent raindrops fell
And echoed in the wells of silence
And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon god they made
And the sign flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming
And the sign said, “The words of the prophets
Are written on the subway walls
And tenement halls
And whispered in the sounds of silence.”
“The Sound Of Silence” was released in October 1964 by Simon & Garfunkel
FORWARD:
In this part of the article we will briefly lay the foundation for a complete and different theory about some of what happened before, during, and after the assassination of Charlie Kirk. This report will briefly analyze the following:
- The cause for the assassination might be ideological, but we don’t think that alone, with only a lone assassin fits all the facts. But it could have more weight if more people were involved. Ideological murder mostly involves intense hate which we don’t see in this case. Ruling out all other paths leads us to analyze the murder from the religious, money, and political viewpoints as primary factors. All three of these possible motives in the murder, as it turns out, may be a motivating factor in the murder of Charlie Kirk.
- We will also look at the possible psychological programming and/or manipulation, brainwashing, mind control, or hyper-persuasion that might have been used in the murder of Charlie Kirk.
PART ONE
SECTION 1 – Who was Charlie Kirk, that someone wanted him dead?
Most people don’t understand just how powerful and important Charlie Kirk had become.
At the memorial service for Charlie Kirk held at the State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona on Sunday, September 21, 2025 it has been reported that from 70.000 to 200,000 people attended; and many thousands more watched live on TV. More people attended than at the services of Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan, Elvis Presley, or Pope Benedict XVI. The following people in the US government attended, flown in on two government 747s:
President Donald Trump – the president of the most powerful country on earth.
Vice President JD Vance
Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins
Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer
Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff
F.B.I. Director Kash Patel
Dan Bongino, deputy director of the F.B.I. and podcast host
Lee Zeldin, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
Attorney General Pam Bondi
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum
Kelly Loeffler, head of the Small Business Administration
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy
Education Secretary Linda McMahon
Education Secretary Linda McMahon
Sergio Gr, head of the White House Presidential Personnel Office
Susie Wiles, White House chief of staff
Other current and former elected officials
House Speaker Mike Johnson
Representative Lauren Boebert, Republican of Colorado
Senator Rick Scott, Republican of Florida
Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas
Representative Celeste Maloy, Republican of Utah
Representative Anna Paulina Luna, Republican of Florida
Former Representative Matt Gaetz, Republican of Florida
Other Notable People
Singers Brandon Lake, Chris Tomlin, Phil Wickham, Kari Jobe, Cody Carnes, and Lee Greenwood
Elon Musk
Benny Johnson
Tucker Carlson
Dr. Ben Carson
Cheryl Hines
Steve Bannon
Kimberly Guilfoyle
Laura Loomer
Kari Lake
Matt Walsh
Patrick Bet-David
Kyle Rittenhouse
Dana White
Riley Gaines
James O’Keefe
When you have a memorial service that large and with all those important people in attendance it shows just how powerful you have become.
But Charlie Kirk’s power was based on much more than numbers; it was mainly based on who was in his Rolodex and would take his calls anytime. That Rolodex contained all the numbers of the top people in the federal and state governments, in business and in education. It was based also on the power Kirk had created in his organization TPUSA and its connected companies.
There was no other person who came close to understanding the younger people, their beliefs and who they would vote for than Kirk – no one. TPUSA was building a large network in all the schools and colleges in the US. Starting with the universities, then colleges, then high schools, and Kirk might have been looking at grade schools too.
Charlie Kirk had even been taken to Korea and Japan just days before his assassination and given the opportunity and offer of much money to expand his organizations into new areas such as Turning Point Korea and Turning Point Japan. But this kind of offer came with not just strings but ropes attached.
Candace Owens covered this in great detail in her latest podcast on 1/8/2026:
The Past Is Prologue: Why Charlie Kirk Was Murdered | Candace Ep 287
This was similar to the offer by the PM of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, when he (allegedly) offered Kirk hundreds of millions to expand in big ways. Something Charlie Kirk turned down.
Charlie Kirk clearly understood the foundation this great country was built on, and Kirk was driven to help the people who had fallen off to get back on that foundation. A foundation built on three things: 1) Self government; 2) Freedom; 3) The beliefs, morals and ethics that can only be found on a large scale in the Christian religion.
Some said that the easiest way to get to President Trump was to go through Charlie Kirk.
Another thing to remember is that we are told that without the help of Charlie Kirk Trump would not have won the election in 2024. Charlie Kirk was very vocal in his views on just about everything, especially during his talks with students at his “prove me wrong” sessions.
A person this powerful with this much influence can have lots of enemies.
SECTION 2 – Catastrophe theory and the concept of good and evil.
Back in our younger days, when we lived in the mountains, our best friend had written a novel. He used to go to the library every day and write a few pages on their Apple II computer. What was interesting though was the main concept of his novel.
Our friend was angry that he was forced to live in a world where there was both good and evil. Our friend, who was Catholic, said it wasn’t fair because he didn’t have any choice in the matter; he didn’t ask to be born here. He asked why did he have to choose between going to Heaven or Hell, or living a certain way? So he took that anger and wrote a novel about an Indian tribe who followed one of their shamans to the top of a high mountain and escaped into another dimension.
We think he had a secret wish to be that shaman! But it was just a novel.
Our brother was living with us at that time and after our two boys fell fast asleep; our brother was there to watch over them. Then we would go over to our friend’s house and we would talk for hours.
What we decided to do those nights that long winter was to catalog a distillation of all of our knowledge and pool it together to try and get a clear picture of reality. Then we were going to outline exactly what had to be done to “fix” the world. We went over the history of science up to that time. Parallel to that we also included all our knowledge of how the body and brain worked. The last parallel component of our research was to include the history of religions and why people believe what they believe.
Even though we didn’t “fix” the world the insights we gained that winter still haunts us to this day. And good and evil still are the controlling factors of each of our lives.
One of the things we looked into was the hot new theory at the time by René Thom called catastrophe theory. Basically a catastrophe was a sudden change in a discontinuous process. Thom was hoping to make his new theory as popular as calculus, which is a theory based on a continuous process. That didn’t happen but there were still many scenarios where the theory did apply. Later E. Christopher Zeeman used what was called “a cusp catastrophe” to examine a discontinuous biological process, that of the fight-or-flight response in dogs. To cause the catastrophe in dogs, i.e. make the dog run away or attack, you would use different tactics based on the dog’s mood and actions. Some people tried to use Thom’s new theory to try and predict when a nation would attack another nation, that didn’t work out. Also most attempts to use the theory on biological processes didn’t work out; biological processes are much too complicated. Especially hard to model was the biological processes of people which also include the complication of conscience.
There are three types of events in this world done by people: good, evil, and neutral.
Every normal (no physical defects) person on earth knows what is good or evil; it is hard wired in and is called a conscience. The only reason a person would want to perform mind control on another is if their intensions are evil.
Is it possible scientists have perfected a version of René Thom’s cusp catastrophe theory to trigger an action by “Brainwashing, Mind Control, or Hyper-Persuasion?” In this version a person/s actions could be controlled down to a given day, without the problems inherent in hypnotism. It is very rare when you can hypnotize a person without their knowledge. More on this later.
All of this is important because there are millions of people in the world today who are controlled by evil and have convinced themselves that it is OK to murder someone who stands in their way or teaches beliefs different than theirs, or just does something they don’t like. It used to be that we settled our differences other ways, but daily a greater percentage of people in the world are acting by violence up to and including murder.
For a person/s to murder someone like Charlie Kirk in cold blood, in front of the world, in broad daylight, they had to be broken, possessed and controlled by the forces of evil.
We mention all of this because if you want to know who murdered Charlie Kirk you must look for a person or persons who believe that it is OK to murder to achieve their goals, whatever they are. This belief will show up in the person/s words and actions long before the actual act. An act this extreme does not happen overnight.
SECTION 3 – Brief Outline of Who might want the Death of Charlie Kirk?
Clearly this 6 point list below is pure speculation and opinion until we know beyond a reasonable doubt, everyone who was involved in the murder of Charlie Kirk. Here are some thoughts and ideas on why someone might want Kirk to die:
- Erika Kirk had (allegedly) found a new lover – a spouse is always the first person the police look at when someone married is murdered. We do not believe this is the case, even if they were having a temporary spat at the time. If new facts emerge…….
- There was Fraud (allegedly) in TPUSA – which would stop and/or be found out shortly. Charlie Kirk had changed some personnel and (allegedly) asked for a complete forensic audit of all the TPUSA organizations. Erika Kirk, now CEO won’t do this.
- Some person/s hated the political and/or religious beliefs of Kirk and what he was doing – this is the official theory, claiming Tyler Robinson was the lone shooter. We believe Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs were involved. We also believe one or more persons very close to them was/were psychologically nudging them with coercion and persuasion into CIA programs of AI generated Hyper-Persuasion.
- Some Zionists (allegedly) – this line of thought is based on the fact that Kirk was having trouble with Jewish supporters who were pulling their financing. They were demanding more control. TPUSA was a 501c3 charity, not a business.
- People fighting for future control of TPUSA, and all its associated companies and organizations; those combined, created a gigantic voting bloc in the millions, and had a platform where hundreds of millions of dollars could be laundered in just a few months.
- All of the above minus #1 – it would be a team effort. A perfect storm. A possible conspiracy (allegedly) based on religion, money, and political grounds using many people. And like any good conspiracy not all of the parties will know each other.
We must find the many heads of this snake!!!
PART TWO
SECTION 4 – Psychological programming and/or manipulation, mind control and hyper-persuasion.
Psychological programming and mind manipulation in all its forms has been around for over 6,000 years.
It might take a simple form such as a mother correctly guiding her child as the child is developing from a baby.
But it can take other forms, and the ultimate form is of course, convincing millions of people to engage in war killing each other.
Many tools have been used over the years to accomplish mind control; of course there are the conventional tools like drugs, money, threats, humiliation, brain implants etc.
But we are now in the age of enlightenment. So what new tools are the people who want to control others using in this day and age?
The tools used today depend on the age bracket of the targets of course, among other things. But we are of the belief that the new tool Hyper-Persuasion, which has just become available in the last few years, is the go to tool for the younger age bracket.
We are of the firm belief that in the assassination of Charlie Kirk, both in person persuasion and Hyper-Persuasion were used for the first time in history to accomplish a public execution. And the most evil part – it was done during Kirk’s most favorite form of communicating.
But there is more to the story. We also believe that Tyler Robinson was recruited (allegedly) by the I3SC, (see below), when he dropped out after one semester at USU.
We believe the initial target (allegedly) was Robinson’s partner, Lance Twiggs, so they could claim another trans murderer. But something happened to their plan, (allegedly) (maybe Twiggs refused to fire the rifle), so they lied to Tyler Robinson and told him just do some little things for us, and we will do all the rest. You won’t have to kill Charlie Kirk, don’t worry we will have your back.
There were many others (allegedly) involved of course, but those people didn’t need any persuasion they had all the hate, greed, jealousy, moral depravity and demonic possession within them already.
Our belief in the above (alleged) theory is not carved in stone, and is open to changes as more facts develop.
For those not familiar with Hyper-Persuasion here is a very brief overview.
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, recently posted on X:
“I expect AI to be capable of superhuman persuasion well before it is superhuman at general intelligence, which may lead to some very strange outcomes.”
On May 17, 2024 the magazine Philosophy & Technology published an article: “Hypersuasion – On AI’s Persuasive Power and How to Deal with It”
Volume 37, article number 64, (2024)
“Powerful advancements in Information and Communication Technologies have continually expanded the scope and sophistication of persuasive tools as they automate not just the recording and distribution but also the management of content. In the latter part of the 20th century, the emergence of the Internet and digital media provided even more targeted channels for influence, with the ability to segment audiences and tailor content based on users’ interests and behaviours collected through digital footprints. Digital technologies became the technologies of persuasion par excellence, so much so that in 1997, Brian Jeffrey Fogg published a paper introducing the neologism “captology” to describe the study of CAPT: Computers As Persuasive Technologies (Fogg, 1997), later expanded in his seminal book (Fogg, 2003).”
“The relentless nature of AI’s hypersuasion, the magnitude of its scope, its availability, affordability, and degree of efficiency based on machine-generated content accurately tailored to individual users or consumers who spend increasing amounts of their lives onlife (both online and offline) in the infosphere overshadow its precursors, not only in terms of the depth of personalised influence but also for the potential scale of distribution and impact (Burtell and Woodside 2023). AI can and will be used, ever more commonly and successfully, to manipulate people’s views, preferences, choices, inclinations, likes and dislikes, hopes, and fears. This may seem unadulterated and unfixable bad news, but, as in the case of rhetoric and pace Plato, it does not have to be. Let us go back to the four elements affected by any persuasive technology.”
Lastly Phys.org published on June 17, 2025, the following article by Liz Mineo, Harvard University: “Mind-control techniques remain with us in social media, cults, AI, elsewhere, new book argues”
Here are some quotes:
“Brainwashing is often viewed as a Cold War relic—think ’60s films like “The Manchurian Candidate” and “The IPCRESS File.”
But Rebecca Lemov, professor of the history of science, argues in her recently released book “The Instability of Truth: Brainwashing, Mind Control, and Hyper-Persuasion” that it still persists. Elements of coercion and persuasion, components of mind and behavior control are used in cults, social media, AI, and even crypto culture, she said.”
“When we’re on social media, we’re constantly being exposed to messages and microenvironments, which resemble the process of brainwashing or mind control.
First, both start with a kind of ungrounding process or successive shocks. If you’re doom scrolling, you’re subjected to successive shocks, and there is a point of disorientation because we can feel overwhelmed by these algorithmically targeted pieces of information that we voluntarily expose ourselves to, but we can’t seem to stop.
Second is milieu control, which is the kind of siloing where you’re only getting controlled messages from certain sources.
That can result in what I call hyper-persuasion, which becomes a third form of brainwashing. What’s concerning is that these new technologies are targeted exactly for you. For example, AI chatbot companions may have your psychological makeup obtained from the internet or from information that you, and all of us, are giving away online.”
Plus a thousand+ more articles. They have been warning everyone, but no one is doing anything about it.
SECTION 5 – The War Game at UVU that ended with the Murder of Charlie Kirk!
The Utah Valley University has a program in National Security Studies
“About the NSS Center
Established in January 2016, the Center for National Security Studies is one of the premier national security programs in the country. The CNSS employs a multi-disciplinary academic approach to examine both the theoretical and practical aspects of national security policy and practice, with areas of focus in intelligence, emerging technology, cybersecurity, and homeland security. The CNSS offers students cutting-edge courses and degree programs, leadership and scholarship opportunities, assistance with jobs and internships, engaged learning, and mentoring.
The Intermountain Intelligence, Industry, and Security Consortium (I3SC) offers a robust suite of academic programs through its co-leading institutions, the Center for National Security Studies (CNSS) and Utah State University’s Center for Anticipatory Intelligence (CAI). These programs are designed to provide students with cutting-edge knowledge and skills in areas critical to national security, intelligence, and industry. Through interdisciplinary coursework, research opportunities, and experiential learning, students are equipped to tackle complex global challenges and advance in their careers with a unique blend of theoretical and practical expertise.”
These are the people of interest running this department.
Ryan Vogel
Director, Center for National Security Studies
Ryan Vogel is an associate professor and the founding Director of the Center for National Security Studies and the National Security Studies academic program at Utah Valley University. He is also the founding co-executive director of the Intermountain Intelligence, Industry, and Security Consortium (I3SC). Before coming to UVU, Professor Vogel served at the Pentagon as a senior policy advisor in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. He began his career at the Pentagon through the Presidential Management Fellowship program and was awarded the Medal for Exceptional Civilian Service in 2014.
John McClure
Associate Director – CNSS
No Bio
Brandon Amacher
Program Director – Emerging Tech Policy Lab
Brandon Amacher is the director of the Emerging Tech Policy Lab for the I3SC and an instructor the UVU Center for National Security Studies where he teaches cybersecurity policy, advanced tech security policy, and cyberwarfare. Brandon comes from as a background in the private sector where he worked as a cyber intelligence analyst and a strategic consultant for various leading cybersecurity organizations including FireEye and Mandiant. Brandon’s areas of expertise include nation-state cyber operations, advanced persistent threats, artificial inteligence security policy, intellectual property theft, the internet of things, and quantum information sciences.
Utah State University has the Center for Anticipatory Intelligence.
“USU’s Center for Anticipatory Intelligence offers strategic training on emergent security challenges and resilience modeling across all sectors: business leaders, military and intelligence professionals, and state and local emergency services personnel. The comparative advantage in professional programming that CAI provides is a multidisciplinary ability to inform participants of the wide-ranging forces – geopolitical, political, cultural, technological, and natural – working together in patterns of weighty relevance for security considerations across future scenarios. The complexity and rapid evolution of these forces are not easily understood, and often threaten to overwhelm enterprises lacking a sophisticated grasp of emergent developments and ramifications. CAI offers three tracks of professional training: its Graduate Certificate and Master of Anticipatory Intelligence for individuals, training workshops for groups of professional personnel, and executive training for corporate leadership.”
These are the people of interest running this department.
Jeannie Johnson
Founding Director | Center for Anticipatory Intelligence
Professor | Department of Political Science
Prior to her academic career, Dr. Johnson worked within the Central Intelligence Agency’s Directorate of Intelligence as a member of the Balkan Task Force from 1998-1999 and served with the US State Department in Embassies Paris and Zagreb. The Cultural Topography analytic method she pioneered with co-author Matt Berrett was featured in CIA’s June 2011 edition of Studies in Intelligence.
Matt Berrett
Cofounder & Adjunct Faculty | Center for Anticipatory Intelligence
Director of Analytics | Space Dynamics Laboratory
Matt Berrett cofounded the Center of Anticipatory Intelligence (CAI) while also serving Space Dynamics Lab as its Director of Analytics after retiring from the Central Intelligence Agency as an Assistant Director. His other senior positions at CIA included serving as Mission Manager for the Near East, South Asia, and Africa in the Directorate of Science and Technology and as the head of three offices in the Directorate of Analysis: Iraq; Near East and South Asia; and Middle East and North Africa. He also served as Director of the President’s Daily Brief, the premier, multiagency intelligence enterprise that informs US presidents and select Cabinet members of key global developments. Mr. Berrett’s work has taken him to nearly 30 countries including living in the Near East for two years; he lived another two in East Asia.
Moises Diaz
Director of Outreach | Center for Anticipatory Intelligence
Clinical Associate Professor | Department of Social Work
Moises Diaz serves as Director of Outreach for the Center for Anticipatory Intelligence. His thirty-year career has included work in social service agencies, university program development, including student recruitment across the US and experience as a multicultural program director. A member of the Utah State University Social Work faculty since 2010, he has held the position of Assistant Field Practicum Director since 2012 with promotion to Clinical Associate Professor in 2019.
Steve Smith
Adjunct Faculty | Center for Anticipatory Intelligence
Steven Smith serves as the China Security Studies Specialist for the Center for Anticipatory Intelligence at Utah State University. He joins CAI after a 32-year career in the military where he served at various times as an Army enlisted Counter-intelligence Special Agent, an Air Force Intelligence Officer, and a China Foreign Area Officer, culminating in his final assignment as the U.S. Air Attache to the People’s Republic of China at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing.
Both programs above were connected to the “Intermountain Intelligence, Industry, and Security Consortium (I3SC).”
“The Center for Anticipatory Intelligence is proud to co-lead the Intermountain Intelligence, Industry, and Security Consortium (I3SC) in partnership with our colleagues at the UVU Center for National Security Studies and nine Utah industry partners. I3SC facilitates a workforce development pipeline that prepares participating USU and UVU students across a wide range of disciplines to advance innovation and help secure Utah’s emerging technology sector. With funding from the Utah State Legislature’s Deep Technology Talent Initiative (DTTI), USU and UVU work in partnership to deliver complementary, interlocking, and stackable academic programs in anticipatory intelligence, security analytics, cybersecurity and secure computing, artificial intelligence, and security studies. CAI and CNSS deliver the goals of the I3SC collaboration through four key avenues:
I3SC joins together CAI, CNSS, and other participating programs at USU and UVU with a standout base of industry support from nine industry partners in Utah: Adobe, AgilePQ, Northrop Grumman, MITRE, Mandiant, Strider, Fortem Technologies, Campbell Scientific, and Space Dynamics Laboratory. Industry partners engage in I3SC by supporting academic curriculum development in annual symposia, contributing to the I3SC Speaker Series, sending industry professionals to guest lecture in courses, and facilitating student internships, externships, capstone projects, and applied research.”
=== End
With all of the information about the two schools programs above let’s look at an article written by David Benson and Ryan Vogel, about one month after Charlie Kirk was assassinated.
“Opinion: We ran a war game at UVU on political violence, and this is what we learned”
David Benson, Ryan Vogel ⋮ 10/15/2025
David Benson, Ph.D., has worked for the past 25 years in national security and is the director of war gaming at Valens Global. Ryan Vogel, JD, LLM, is the director of the Center for National Security Studies at UVU and co-director of the Intermountain Intelligence, Industry, and Security Consortium (I3SC)
Here are quotes from the article with our commentary.
“More than a year ago, we held a war game at Utah Valley University (UVU) about political violence in the United States — something that would soon rear its head on campus. Now that UVU, Utah and the United States are grappling fully with the implications of Charlie Kirk’s assassination and other incidents of political violence, especially the recent shooting in a Michigan church, we thought it appropriate to share that the stakes are — amazingly — even higher than most imagine.”
[Editor: It was the opening statement of this article that really caught our attention. It was clear to us in this article that Charlie Kirk’s assassination was like something that would have been covered in their “war game.” Since this war game was only months before Charlie Kirk’s assassination we couldn’t help but take note that maybe in the case of UVU’s “extended war game,” when it was finished officially, maybe it never really quit. That is because this type of operation takes time. Of course that also means Charlie Kirk’s assassination (allegedly) may have been in the works starting early in 2025.]
“Our war game included students, professionals and local leaders playing the roles of domestic and international governments. In the war game, the players portraying international adversaries could clandestinely exploit tension in the United States. Unsurprisingly, they seized the opportunity and never let go.”
[Editor: Translation; in the extended war game they could use real CIA and Zionist agents to (allegedly) get members of TPUSA along with Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs to do their bidding.]
“The willingness of international actors to exploit political division is not unique to players from Utah or UVU. We’ve run the same war game across the United States, and every time a team playing one of the United States’ adversaries can sow discord, they do.”
[Editor: Duh, that is the purpose of war games.]
The international effects of political violence
“You see, domestic discord — and especially political violence — is an irresistible siren song to enemies of democracy. If you oppose the United States, fomenting violence in the United States, dividing Americans against each other, even getting Americans to kill one another, does your work for you.”
[Editor: This is the real scary part. It is scary because there are two types of enemies in the world the USA faces today. The first enemy is external, these enemies want to overthrow the USA completely and do away with the US constitution, and occupy our lands. The other enemy is more deadly because they are internal, they call you friend, partner, bro, or brother and sister, but they want to change all the laws and rules to create a USA that is completely communistic and socialistic. They want to eliminate the Bill of Rights completely. And the tools they are using today are discord, division and violence.]
“To be clear, we are not implying foreign actors caused or supported any specific episode. Investigations into each event will uncover international support, if any, and only then should we draw conclusions. However, adversaries will capitalize on tragedies, and we ignore the international dynamics inherent in political violence to our peril. If Americans are willing to shed each other’s blood for political reasons, authoritarian agents may push them, directly or indirectly. And if Americans can be divided, adversaries will feed them with emotional and intellectual support to push them deeper into extremist poles.”
[Editor: Another really scary part. This reminds us of the time the PM of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, just a very short time after Charlie Kirk was assassinated went on live TV to say that Israel had nothing to do with his death. Why did he say that? We all know the answer. Here again David Benson and Ryan Vogel are doing the same thing. When they wrote their article nobody was accusing them of bringing their war game into reality. But that statement sure makes them look guilty of something. Why deny something no one is accusing you of? Just saying.]
[“Editor: The last part of the above quote:
”If Americans are willing to shed each other’s blood for political reasons, authoritarian agents may push them, directly or indirectly. And if Americans can be divided, adversaries will feed them with emotional and intellectual support to push them deeper into extremist poles.”
Seems to explain here how they are using the “cusp catastrophe” and Hyper-Persuasion together to control people’s beliefs and actions.]
“Unfortunately, the logic of the “Manchurian Candidate” dominates how many people think or talk about foreign interference in political violence. People often assume if a foreign government acts in the American political system, it must want something specific. While no doubt foreign governments would love to puppeteer others to do their will, it is hard to control individuals or groups clandestinely from afar. It is harder through the chaos of political violence.”
[Editor: Right, that is why most of the time they don’t do it from afar; they do it locally.]
“But democracy’s enemies need not control the chaos, because chaos is the point. Dictators and despots do not need democracies to do their bidding. They only need democracies to be too weak or distracted to act effectively, and tyrants can then do as they please.”
“The USSR did not support the Red Army Faction because there was a realistic chance they would overthrow the government in Bonn. Shifting German resources away from challenging the Soviets was success enough to merit Soviet support. Divide and conquer is a strategic maxim for a reason. Prolonged internal division, especially when it becomes violent and hateful, is a national security concern.”
We the people can and must end political violence
“The natural question, then, is: “What is the solution?” There are no easy answers. But the solution must come from the people. Many policy prescriptions fail when foreign governments become involved. Whatever domestic governments can take away through laws and regulations, a foreign government can supply, especially in the internet era.”
“We the people must collectively decide to live together again and re-embrace a peaceful political process where we value compromise and communication. Division and political violence are not problems experts alone can solve. Any imposed solution is no solution at all. Americans have successfully trod this path before, and we can do it again. The stakes may be higher, but the problem is the same. If we do not solve the problem of political violence, we will not only be fighting against ourselves — our adversaries will be there to fan the flames.”
[Editor: We agree with this last paragraph completely.]
=== End
This section would not be complete without quoting from the article:
“‘Wolverine’ cyber soldiers: UVU’s national security students determined to combat global tech threats” Published: Dec 11, 2024. By Jason Swensen, Deseret News.
In reality, “black-hat” hackers come from all walks of life. They live in all areas of the world and often work for legitimate companies. For cyber criminals, “blending” is a prized skill. That middle-aged woman in the pea coat sitting across from you on the train is likely not a hacker.
But she could be.
Meanwhile, cyber security specialists — the guys and gals in the “white hats” — look pretty much like the faculty and students at Utah Valley University’s Center for National Security Studies.
They’re your Utah neighbors, friends and classmates.
“They are very average, everyday people who have dedicated their lives to address national security issues — and they very rarely see the limelight,” said Brandon Amacher, a cybersecurity professional and instructor at the center.
Established in 2016, the Center for National Security Studies has grown to approximately 400 students, offering UVU students hands-on technical training in subjects such as national security, intelligence and emerging platforms such as AI.
“But in today’s world, a small business could be hit with an Iranian cybertool,” said Vogel. “Those threats are everywhere. It’s non-state actors. It’s terrorist groups. It’s organized crime groups. It’s rogue actors like Russia, Iran or Venezuela.”
The “good guys”, he added, are vital in anticipating, identifying and ultimately combating the daily cyber threats to individuals, businesses, governments and the international community.
Meanwhile, all of the program’s faculty and staff are security practitioners or former practitioners.
Vogel, for example, established his security bona fides at the U.S. Defense Department. The program’s emerging tech policy lab director, Amacher, is a cybersecurity professional, while Open Source Intelligence Center program director Mary Kent is a U.S. Army veteran and an analyst who works with Utah law enforcement agencies.
“We bring that (experience) into the classroom, allowing our students to do briefings, professional writing and assisting on actual cases,” added Vogel. “It’s hands-on learning … which leads to industry-ready professionals.”
=== End
We are going to end section 5 with a document from Valens Global. Remember David Benson, Ph.D., has worked for the past 25 years in national security and is the director of war gaming at Valens Global. He was co-author of the article above – “We ran a war game at UVU on political violence, and this is what we learned.”
Here is the 6 pg. document – “Simulations & Wargaming in an Academic Setting”
Some scary stuff in here, because they literally tell you how some people are using mind control to take over America. Always remember the USA, our way of life and the citizens themselves have many enemies both foreign and domestic. Our enemies are continually trying to turn our citizens into people who deny reality, into people who think they can change a man into a woman, or into people who will believe anything the government or businesses say, and people who continually fight with each other, even up to murder.
=== End of Section 5
SECTION 6 – Where do we go from here?
- In our opinion people still need to work on finding the truth of WHO were involved in the conspiracy. With proof beyond a reasonable doubt, giving names.
- And of course people still need to come up with a definitive method of HOW Kirk was killed. This proof needs to answer all questions about that day.
- We are posting as fast as we are able, on our site here, all of the information including facts, theories and the main timeline to help people out so they aren’t duplicating efforts, and just spinning their wheels.
- And pray we find out all the people involved in the conspiracy before Tyler Robinson is found guilty of being the lone shooter. Because if that happens it will be almost impossible to make anyone believe anything else.
=== End of CKM-002