We will cover every theory of “HOW” Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Of course knowing “HOW” will also help to lead to the answer of “WHY.”
The theory of “HOW” Kirk was killed that can answer the most questions people bring up will get the most attention and coverage here.
The first questions came from all the videos posted and news interviews of the assassination of Kirk. Then the next set of questions came after Tyler Robinson was arrested and the police revealed the indictment along with other legal documents. After those two milestones the real research by the people started, leading to hundreds of questions, which continues to this day. As researched progressed many of the questions were answered by the people themselves, the authorities, or other people involved in the event or organizations connected to either Kirk or Roberson.
If someone could get the family of Tyler Robinson to give us a copy of any doctor’s report that worked on Kirk at the hospital that would really help.
If someone would get the family of Tyler Robinson to give us a copy of the official autopsy, that would help everyone more than anything else.
An official autopsy would stop many lines of inquiry and investigation. That in turn would allow all the people to spend their time and resources finding answers to the other really important questions.
And never forget all of this research being done by all of the people will help anyone now charged with a crime and help find any other people who may be involved; if this was a conspiracy as most people think.
Here is a (non-exhaustive) list of questions, still unanswered, that people have been asking. Everyone of these questions must be clearly and definitely answered. Most are on the subject of “HOW,” but with some “WHY” thrown in also.
- The very first question on everyone’s mind who know anything about gun wounds from a 30-06 rifle was — why wasn’t Kirk’s head blown off, or at the very least the complete right side of his neck? See our article here on this website on the comparison between the assassinations of Charlie Kirk and Martin Luther King Jr.
- How did the person on the roof get the rifle up on the roof without anyone seeing the rifle?
- Similar to the question above was how did the person on the roof get the rifle off the roof. The video provided by the police clearly show that when the person dropped off the roof he had no rifle.
- Why wasn’t anyone watching the roofs? It would only take one or two at most standing on the highest roofs to see all the roofs.
- Why weren’t drones allowed?
- Why wasn’t the event held indoors?
- Why wasn’t everyone screened and backpacks searched?
- Why was the event held on such a short notice?
- Why did Kirk change his security team?
- Why have some people been taken off the online list of people associated with TPUSA? Is this temporary just till things blow over?
- Why has Michael (Mikey) McCoy’s name been removed from the TPUSA website? The TPUSA website used to list Mikey as the the chief of staff. Now the TPUSA website calls this section Human Capital, with nobody listed as running it. Who is the TPUSA chief of staff today? Why is this person not listed on the list of staff personnel?
(As an aside we think that it is hugely gross and demeaning to working people that a business or organization calls their staff department, “Human Capital.” We guess this is a holdover from the old legal definition of all employees as servants. See Black’s.) - Why has Rob McCoy gone silent? What is his position now with TPUSA?
- What caused Kirk’s necklace to fly off his body?
- What caused Kirk’s tee shirt to fly up like it did?
- If Robinson “confessed” to his parents and friends, why not to the police?
- Why was Erika Kirk smiling, laughing and having fun talking about the future in a long podcast, just 16 days after Kirk was assassinated, but then many times later, some even weeks later, Erika was patting her eyes with fake tears? Maybe Erika is like Meghan Markle who can cry on demand.
- Why did the leader of a foreign country, a PM, Benjamin Netanyahu, feel it necessary within an extremely short time after Kirk’s assassination to go on national TV to give a public statement that Israel did not have any part in Kirk’s death.
This was so strange that it opened up a lot of questions about the part Israel might have had in Kirk’s death.
Charlie Kirk was the creator, leader and driving force behind the largest organization influencing the political voting block of the younger generation. Kirk had just days and weeks before his death decided not to continue his support of the Zionist movement like he had in the past. This was known to hundreds of people. Is it possible that someone else wanted to control this voting block? - Israel is well known for its spy type of activities, attacking, killing and injuring people, is it possible that Israel, maybe with CIA help, came up with a different way to assassinate Charlie Kirk, other than shooting him with a 30-06 rifle? Remember the pager attacks.
- ETC., ETC, ETC. We may add to this list later. If someone wants to help and send us more questions that have not been answered we will add them.